BRIAN KENNY: At present on Chilly Name, we’ll discuss one thing all of us have, however many people haven’t any clue what it’s. I’m talking of a carbon footprint. It’s a time period that helps to explain the full quantity of greenhouse gases, primarily carbon dioxide, launched into the ambiance due to human actions that contribute to local weather change. Your footprint contains emissions from belongings you do on daily basis, like driving, heating your private home, consuming, and buying. The typical carbon footprint within the US is the equal of 16 metric tons of carbon dioxide, which is about thrice the worldwide common. The excellent news is that you would be able to cut back your footprint by merely doing much less of these issues. But when that’s not an choice and also you wish to make an enormous discount quick, you’ll be able to flip to carbon credit. World carbon markets are valued at almost $1 trillion and rising quick. As organizations and nations race to adjust to carbon discount targets, it’s an advanced and chaotic panorama. At present on Chilly Name, we welcome Professor Mike Toffel and visitor Duncan van Bergen to debate the case, “Calyx World: Ranking Carbon Credit.” I’m your host Brian Kenny, and also you’re listening to Chilly Name on the HBR Podcast Community.
Mike Toffel’s analysis examines how firms are addressing local weather change and different environmental and dealing situation points. He’s additionally a fellow podcaster as creator and host of HBS’s Local weather Rising. Mike, welcome.
MIKE TOFFEL: Thanks a lot, Brian.
BRIAN KENNY: Haven’t had you on the present shortly. It’s nice to have you ever again.
MIKE TOFFEL: It’s nice to be right here.
BRIAN KENNY: And right this moment we’re actually happy to have the protagonist in our case, Duncan van Bergen, who’s a co-founder at Calyx World, who beforehand labored at Shell and McKinsey, and he’s a graduate of Harvard Enterprise College. Duncan, welcome.
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: Thanks. Thanks a lot for having me.
BRIAN KENNY: I felt like I needed to clarify carbon footprint on the outset as a result of I don’t perceive it, and I’m going to imagine lots of our listeners don’t both. I truly made an try to grasp what my carbon footprint is, and I’m embarrassed to say that it’s not 16. It’s like 23.4, which to make use of a Boston slang time period is depraved dangerous, I feel.
MIKE TOFFEL: Yeah, it’s most likely pushed by flights, is my guess.
BRIAN KENNY: So right this moment we’re going to speak about carbon credit and the carbon market, and Calyx is on the heart of that dialogue. It’s difficult, proper Duncan?
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: It may be a bit difficult, certainly. Yeah.
BRIAN KENNY: We’re going to get into a few of the particulars of what makes it difficult, however Mike, I assumed I’d begin with you. I at all times wish to ask our college what conjures up them to write down a selected case and why they suppose it could make for a great dialogue within the classroom. What was it about Calyx?
MIKE TOFFEL: Yeah, that’s a terrific query. The voluntary carbon markets is a extremely fascinating house as a result of once we take into consideration the necessity for firms and international locations to scale back their carbon footprint, we frequently will take into consideration organizations making investments in-house to, for instance, change their heating from pure fuel to electrified warmth pumps. And procuring renewable power to energy that, or different makes an attempt like that. These are actually necessary. In addition they can take motion of their merchandise to make them extra power environment friendly, however on the identical time, there’s numerous costly objects after they get by the primary few. And so what carbon credit do is that they provide the alternative to pay others who’ve cheaper strategies of lowering their carbon footprint, and you then get to assert credit score for it. There’s a particular variety of activists and different involved individuals who don’t view this as equal within the carbon house. And a part of that cause is that there’s been a lot of scandals which have proven that those that are taking the motion, whom you’re paying to scale back emissions, usually are not essentially doing the calculations appropriately, they’re exaggerating, or there’s efforts to reverse. Typically there’s a forest fireplace or there’s subsequent improvement that may take out some bushes that you simply’d planted, that they’d planted in your behalf. And so there’s been some controversy round this.
One of many fascinating arbiters of this to enter the market to attempt to assist consumers determine which of those carbon credit are extra legit than others are carbon credit standing businesses. Calyx World is on the heart of that, together with a number of different firms. And I met Duncan a number of years in the past at a HBS reunion the place he sat on a panel that I moderated about local weather change. And that was the primary I’d actually heard of this market. And the primary I’d met Duncan, and subsequently I’ve met him and his colleagues and it’s a brilliant fascinating house.
BRIAN KENNY: Yeah. Duncan, let me flip to you for a minute, and I’d love to listen to extra about Calyx, about why you had been concerned in founding it and what had been a few of the belongings you had been making an attempt to resolve by getting concerned on this house?
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: My co-founder, Donna Lee, and I mainly got here in our personal very separate methods from a spot of what I’d say is firsthand understanding of simply how difficult it may be for a purchaser of carbon credit. And lots of the consumers are firms to know which credit truly ship on the claims the credit score makes. And simply to get that out of the way in which, the core declare a carbon credit score makes is that it stands for one metric ton, of eliminated or lowered emissions. Identical to Mike defined, they purchase this credit score on the idea that, hey, it actually stands for a ton, and I can compensate for a ton of my emissions for this one credit score. And we knew firsthand, we had seen and lived firsthand, that it may be fairly difficult to know which credit truly fulfill that declare and which don’t. And we each come from a spot the place our core assumption is that consumers wish to have actual influence, that that is extra than simply window dressing, and that they need to have the ability to make the precise selection. And the flip facet of that’s clearly additionally true, is that firms don’t wish to be referred to as out for having purchased junk credit and claims of greenwashing, observe that, et cetera, et cetera. However once more, it may be a bit bit difficult to separate the wheat from the chaff on this market. And that’s the place we are available in with Calyx World. We wish to make it straightforward for firms to choose for extra actual influence with carbon credit.
BRIAN KENNY: Yeah. Mike, possibly you can provide our listeners a greater understanding of, we’ve acquired the voluntary credit after which we’ve acquired the obligatory credit. How are these totally different and the place does Calyx match kind of within the panorama of the voluntary credit score house?
MIKE TOFFEL: Yeah, so the origin of carbon buying and selling actually comes from the regulatory house and the UN treaties that allowed international locations to satisfy a few of their targets by shopping for credit from different international locations, whether or not that’s inside the EU for instance, or globally throughout much less developed international locations, investing in initiatives, promoting to extra developed international locations. In order that was the origin. However then the diffusion and the unfold of nations signing up for targets to which they might be held legally accountable in a considerably weak worldwide framework, actually didn’t take off past the EU and some different international locations. In response, lots of international locations and even cities and organizations like Harvard have stated, “We predict this nonetheless must occur.” And they also’ve kind of crammed within the breach with this voluntary carbon market. And so, you see web zero targets or science-based targets, an entire litany of voluntary commitments, different commitments simply say, we wish to cut back our carbon footprint by X % by a given date. Harvard College has stated that we wish to cut back our fossil gasoline emissions to zero ultimately. And within the quick time period, we wish to cut back our fossil gasoline emissions. We wish to neutralize them having web zero fossil gasoline by 2026. Meaning not solely lowering our carbon but in addition lowering the well being impacts of fossil fuels.
And so for that, we’re making an attempt to determine what are the precise actions internally and externally to determine the package deal of actions to pursue. So, for instance, and that is an space the place I’m working with our college colleagues to attempt to assist determine this out. We not too long ago introduced that we’re investing in some new renewable capability throughout the US to attempt to offset, we don’t name it offset there, however we are saying neutralize, the facility, the fossil fuels related to the facility manufacturing, the electrical energy that we buy.` However then we have now fossil fuels that we combust on campus for heating and for the buses and vehicles that we function. And we’re making an attempt to determine how a lot of that and the way quickly will we decarbonize these shift to electrical typically, versus serious about `what sort of carbon credit ought to we procure? And for that course of having, we even have a contract with Calyx, we’re a subscriber to their service in order that we are able to see their tackle varied carbon credit, and we have now entry to their consultants. We’ve had many conversations with Donna, Duncan’s colleague, about how to consider the market. So I’m not solely writing a case about them, however I’m additionally getting a perspective from, yeah, the consumer perspective and from a staff that’s making an attempt to determine how will we meet these targets.
BRIAN KENNY: Yeah, that’s a terrific transition to a query I’ve for you, Duncan, which is, as you’re serious about the ranking system, are you able to inform us what makes for a high-quality credit score? What are the kind of greatest pink flags that you simply see the place it involves low-quality credit?
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: For starters, let me maybe emphasize that we have a look at three totally different dimensions of high quality once we say we charge credit. The one that everyone thinks about is what we name greenhouse fuel integrity. Does this credit score actually characterize one ton? And that’s positively one space that we focus so much on, however there’s two others. One is what we name SDG influence. And SDG influence seems at when credit make claims of getting influence on a number of of the UN sustainable improvement targets, is there substance behind that declare? And infrequently individuals suppose, Hey, that’s just a bit layer of promoting on prime of the credit score, however we imagine that it’s doable to investigate that as properly. And third, we have a look at one thing referred to as environmental and social danger when it comes to, does this credit score in any manner current a danger of hurt to the neighborhood during which the mission is operated or the surroundings the place it takes place?
However let me return to that first one, which lots of people ask about is okay, properly, how will we assess greenhouse fuel integrity? It’s actually a three-step course of. First, we assess the carbon crediting program, so the set of the infrastructure, if you’ll, that’s used to create credit. There are a variety of requirements which were used for a decade or two like this all over the world, and we charge these requirements, if you want, when it comes to as a setup, as a construction, as an infrastructure. Do they really work with sufficient transparency, with sufficient scientific content material, et cetera to essentially be capable to assure the supply of fine credit?
The second step is we conduct a really in-depth evaluate of the methodology used to create the carbon credit. In order you’ll be able to think about, credit from capturing methane coming off landfills are very totally different in nature than what Mike was speaking about earlier than, planting bushes or a few of the extra superior expertise approaches like issues like enhanced rock weathering or biochar manufacturing or issues like that. They’re all very totally different and every has their very own methodology. So we evaluate these methodologies.
The third and remaining step is reviewing the precise particular person initiatives that create carbon credit. In order that particular person mission the place methane escaping from a landfill, you’ll be able to nearly think about it, is being captured and both flared into much less heavy greenhouse gases or is captured to supply electrical energy from. And so we have a look at that mission and we have a look at an entire collection of dangers. And these dangers are pretty generally accepted within the house. They embrace additionality: would this mission have occurred with out carbon finance? As a result of the precept is that if a mission would have occurred anyway, you then shouldn’t get credit for it. Issues like permanence. Mike was referring to it earlier, what sort of mitigations are in place to ensure that if reversals occur, that these are correctly accounted for? Issues like linkage: are the emission financial savings or removals not simply being displaced to a different space when say we shield a chunk of forest, how will we ensure that defending this piece of forest doesn’t result in extra deforestation 100 miles to the east or west? There’s a lot of dangers like that, and people are actually a few of the extra well-known ones that we assess as a part of this course of.
BRIAN KENNY: Yeah, and also you’re not the one ones doing this, proper? The case talks about another individuals within the house or organizations which can be within the house. I’m questioning how alike or totally different are your rankings from theirs, and the way does this kind of form the influence of the market?
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: Yeah, you’re proper. There are a few different raters within the house, and I feel it’s a great factor that there’s selection on this house. And I feel it’s an necessary level as a result of generally I’m going to conferences and other people attempt to problem me and say, properly, cling on. Not everyone even agrees on what high quality means in carbon credit. And I’d say, “I feel that’s incorrect. I feel everyone’s just about aligned.” And I’d level to the core carbon ideas of the ICVCM, the Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market. As 10 actually good ideas that define what a carbon credit score should adjust to or the usual that ought to be met. And I can say, I feel all of the rankings businesses approaches are plugged into these core carbon ideas. I’d say past that, sure, there are some variations. A number of the dangers that every of us assesses are we assess them a bit totally different, and that may result in totally different rankings for the same mission. And it additionally signifies that say a double B in a single ranking system doesn’t imply precisely the identical as a double B in one other system. It’s a younger trade. I anticipate that regularly there will probably be convergence as all of us turn into an increasing number of clear about how we do it, and we get to benchmark our approaches. I’m certain there’s going to be some studying moving into all instructions.
BRIAN KENNY: And we all know expertise has a huge impact, and the appearance of AI is impacting just about every part. I’m questioning what you see as the way forward for expertise in credit score and carbon rankings.
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: I’m going to instantly lose each shred of credibility that I’ve constructed up within the final couple of minutes. I’m going to launch 4 or 5 buzzwords in a single go after which defend that all of them apply. And after I say digitization it’s sort of an apparent one, however then I’m going to say distant sensing and geospatial, then I’m going to say blockchain, then I’m going to say AI is the cherry on prime. However I feel all of them are related. And I’d begin with digitization. I’d say this ecosystem remains to be in a strategy of digitization. Many elements of this chain which can be being performed with PDFs and a few pretty fundamental methodologies. There’s a very generally used course of for measuring the girth of bushes. It’s referred to as measurement at chest peak. And lots of the documentation is being handed from one participant within the ecosystem to a different by utilizing PDF paperwork which can be uploaded and downloaded onto registries. That’s clearly not the way in which it’s going to be. That is going to turn into extra digital. Each participant goes to have the digital document on the market, and we hope and sit up for having the ability to plug right into a extra digital model of this ecosystem. Distant sensing and geospatial is way talked about within the house, and the advances have been great over the past couple of many years. And the provision, the ubiquity of geospatial knowledge, has additionally simply exploded. We use it extensively. We make the case that you would be able to’t dispose of all points of high quality evaluation simply by saying, “Hey, I’ve acquired satellite tv for pc knowledge.” However we predict it’s a really great tool, and each builders and ourselves make intensive use of it.
And you then get to issues like blockchain and AI. I’ll simply point out it as a result of if you concentrate on what blockchain is sweet at, it’s about ensuring there’s a clear chain of custody alongside an entire collection of gamers, and also you want to have the ability to ensure that no matter adjustments are performed, that there’s a clear document of it. Now, I feel that’s sort of nearly the textbook case for that sort of distributed expertise, and I haven’t but seen anyone actually crack how it could play a job right here, however I’ve to anticipate that that’s going to be the case. After which lastly, AI, I feel goes to play an enormous function when it comes to serving to speed up issues like knowledge ingestion and interpretation. And we’re closely experimenting with how we are able to deploy that well, each in our personal sort of back-office course of in addition to for serving to our clients. However I’ll say one factor on that after which I’ll cease my buzzword enjoyable honest.
BRIAN KENNY: I’ve loved it. I’ve loved the buzzword-
MIKE TOFFEL: Buzzword Bingo.
BRIAN KENNY: Yeah.
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: I ponder the place I discovered that, however I used to be listening to a different podcast—not fairly pretty much as good as this one—
BRIAN KENNY: Thanks.
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: —of The Economist the opposite day, and it was concerning the significance of knowledge in the entire AI revolution. They had been saying there’s three issues, proper? There’s compute energy that’s elevated tremendously. Algorithms and knowledge. And what we discover ourselves sitting on at Calyx World is among the greatest troves of deep insights into what makes sure methodologies work and never work, what makes sure mission sorts work and never work. And so we’re actually targeted on ensuring we proceed to curate that greatest and largest set of data round how carbon credit work, how carbon crediting initiatives work, how high quality works, how these totally different requirements and methodologies work. And we predict that’s a key piece of how this expertise panorama will form up.
BRIAN KENNY: Yeah, that every one makes nice sense. Mike, I wish to come again to one thing you had been alluding to earlier, and that is extra concerning the central theme that runs by the case, actually addresses the challenges to integrity. And possibly you’ll be able to for our listeners lay out a bit bit what a few of the greatest dangers are to integrity for companies like Calyx as they attempt to set up themselves on this place.
MIKE TOFFEL: Properly, I feel one of many greatest dangers to Calyx or any ranking company is their must be considered to be and to be considered as honest arbiters of the analyses that they’re conducting. And that is true for inspectors, that’s a few of the work I do is inspectors who’re going to look into international provide chain factories to let the manufacturers know the way the manufacturing unit is doing. They share an identical want for integrity. They must be considered as straight shooters who’re going to inform the reality regardless of who pays them. And there’s some proof in that house that who pays them truly influences their stories, which is problematic. In monetary rankings of bonds, for instance, it’s normally the bond issuer who pays the monetary rater, this Moody’s or S&P or Pitch to do their ranking. It’s not nice from an optics perspective {that a} municipality or an organization is paying somebody to evaluate the integrity and chapter danger of their very own entity. However that’s the way in which the world works in monetary rankings.
Take into consideration auditing, proper? Monetary auditing, identical factor. Ostensibly the board hires the auditors, however normally with the assent of the company managers to audit the agency, you’re like, that doesn’t appear nice, proper? They’re purported to be working for the shareholder. So anyway, there’s all this background of kind of potential conflicts of curiosity and enter the carbon credit standing house, a reasonably new house, as Duncan talked about, they’re including worth to many gamers. They’re including worth to consumers, whether or not it’s Harvard or Microsoft or whomever who wish to know which of those carbon credit have extra integrity than others. They’re additionally including worth actually to builders of high-quality rankings. As a result of ultimately, as these rankings get integrated in pricing, builders who supply high-quality initiatives are going to get larger costs for his or her credit. And those who have decrease high quality initiatives will get decrease costs. Like that’s the way in which it’s purported to work.
So you’ll be able to think about, properly, one of many questions is in case you’re including worth to a wide range of gamers, who must you attempt to promote to? Like who must you truly acquire revenues from? And what’s fascinating on this house is simply since you’re creating worth for a bunch of gamers doesn’t imply it’s the precise factor to do to attempt to seize that worth from these gamers. And what Duncan and Donna and Calyx have performed to date, as I perceive, is that they’re actually very a lot targeted on this and targeted on incomes revenues from consumers. That’s their fundamental play. They’ve a subscription mannequin they are saying though we add worth for builders too, we’re going to deal with the customer facet. Now, a few of the rivals are making totally different selections as a result of you’ll be able to think about when do you charge? On this case, they’re ranking after the carbon credit are issued, or at the least technically maybe as soon as the mission is registered and prepared and out there to promote credit.
And so if Harvard College needs to determine to purchase credit, we are able to look on Calyx’s web site by our subscription and see which initiatives are extremely rated, which of them are poorly rated. As far as I perceive, they’re not promoting to builders. Others on this house are promoting to builders. And once more, you’ll be able to see why, as a result of builders of top of the range need to have the ability to promote that. However you then’re like, hmm, there is likely to be a notion at the least of a battle of curiosity. And so I feel that’s a brilliant fascinating query that we’ll debate within the classroom. That is what drew me in. I’m within the context, however I feel what’s going to be so fascinating within the classroom moreover speaking concerning the attributes of carbon credit that make them extra reliable or extra genuine and credible, is that this query of enterprise technique and who do you promote to? What are the results? What’s the upside? What’s the potential draw back?
BRIAN KENNY: Yeah. Duncan, does this all ring true to you? I’m questioning how do you concentrate on navigating the battle of curiosity challenge? Have been there different fashions that you simply checked out? I imply, you’re nonetheless a younger agency. What had been a few of the issues that you simply possibly thought, properly, we don’t wish to do it that manner, we wish to do it this fashion?
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: Yeah, it completely resonates and might be has been and continues to be a core subject of dialogue between Donna and myself and others within the staff. How will we be sure we fulfill our mission? Our mission as an organization is to attempt to make carbon markets stronger, make them higher, and have extra influence each for the planet and for individuals. Donna and I each have been on this house for fairly some time. I’ve been in carbon markets for approaching a decade. Donna has been in local weather and carbon for over 20 years, however we began the corporate in 2021 when carbon markets in comparison with right this moment had been completely booming. Demand was rising hand over fist, and Donna and I had been each ready the place we had seen firsthand that there was truly a really large variability in high quality out there. There have been junk credit and there have been actually high-quality credit.
And we had been additionally conscious of a few of the questions being raised by media and civil society round integrity and round a few of these credit and the problems with them. I wouldn’t fairly go as far as that saying that we predicted this disaster of confidence that’s been out there for the final couple of years. However we positively had been conscious of the issues. And once we regarded on the core points behind these issues, we noticed an absence of transparency and misaligned incentives as key to why these issues existed. And Donna truly wrote an fascinating weblog on this subject not way back. It’s referred to as, “Carbon Credit as Credence Items, Why That Issues.” And certainly, they’re credence items. You’ve got this actually large imbalance between what a developer is aware of about carbon credit and what the customer is aware of. And meaning you must be extra cautious. And these incentives, it’s honest to say that a lot of events within the ecosystem, together with the requirements our bodies, together with the verification and validation our bodies, the auditors which can be paid on this house are paid for quantity. They’re paid for the variety of carbon credit issued, and that makes the builders their clients. And I’ll be the final one to say that any occasion in that alternate is making an attempt to do the incorrect factor, nevertheless it makes the developer your buyer, it makes quantity, your goal operate. Yeah. Extra quantity, extra money for everyone. And we made a elementary selection that we thought the function we wished to play as that unbiased arbiter, that unbiased advisor, that we might greatest play that if we prevented that battle altogether by not promoting rankings to builders. So right this moment, you can’t, as a developer, pay us to conduct a ranking for you both earlier than the credit score’s being issued or after the credit score’s being issued. We oriented our enterprise mannequin solely to the purchase facet.
So yeah, it’s been a query that we’ve revisited a lot of instances, however each time we have now believed that orienting ourselves to the purchase facet is certainly the viable mannequin. And we imagine nonetheless wanting on the market right this moment, that unbiased view on high quality continues to be a worth. And that as a matter of reality, past the standard query, there are many different frictions on this market the place we predict we are able to present, as an unbiased occasion a terrific service nearly as an unbiased trusted gateway to the market.
BRIAN KENNY: This actually looks like a key theme all through the case. The truth is, the case references the Guardian article as kind of an indicator of the way in which the media has reacted to this. There’s lots of skepticism, maybe understandably, as a result of individuals don’t actually get it, they don’t actually perceive it deeply sufficient to know whether or not or not it’s legitimate know. How has Calyx, the function that they’ve performed right here making an attempt to coach the market, how has that labored?
MIKE TOFFEL: I’d say the skepticism doesn’t a lot come from a lack of information. I feel it comes from the truth that the trade is weak to shaky-quality credit. And there’s a lot of efforts underway to attempt to sort of shake out of the market such credit, carbon ranking businesses like Calyx is a kind of performs. There’s others, Duncan had talked about the ICVCM, the Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market. That’s a comparatively latest nonprofit that’s come out to attempt to make public its selections about what mandatory parts are for the standard of credit and the applications which can be additionally referred to as requirements or registries. These are firms just like the Gold Normal and Verra and so forth, who had been the only real arbiters actually, of what qualifies for being referred to as a credit score and whose methodologies had been attacked, for instance, by that Guardian article. And by subsequent articles as properly, they’re additionally going through this strain and tightening their belts and updating their methodologies and updating their oversight over the third events they rent on the mission degree referred to as verifiers and validators, third-party organizations which can be concerned with guaranteeing the initiatives meet these applications. So there’s lots of gamers right here. In order that they’re each making an attempt to extend the stringency of their requirements and their oversight of those verifiers. So there’s lots of motion proper now afoot.
What can be fascinating to see as you have a look at snapshots over time from Calyx’s rankings and from its rivals’ rankings, is the distribution rising proper? Are we seeing fewer low-quality credit in the marketplace and extra high-quality in the marketplace? That might be kind of good proof that really this market’s shifting. I’d be keen on Duncan’s perspective, however from my view of some latest stories by Calyx and by BeZero and others on this house, they’re nonetheless exhibiting only a few high-quality and many low-quality carbon credit in the marketplace. So there’s numerous work to be performed for my part. Though I do suppose we’re shifting in the precise path. I don’t suppose we’re a 12 months or two away from this being resolved. However Duncan, can I chilly name you to ask you your take?
BRIAN KENNY: Yeah, you stated you want chilly calls.
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: I’m undecided you had been supposed to inform everyone that, however look, it’s the precise query, Mike. Is the market enhancing? We not too long ago launched a collection of indices, we name it the Calyx Carbon Integrity Index. And we have now two one on the issuance facet, which is a little bit of a number one indicator, and the opposite one on the retirement facet, which is a lagging indicator. And actually what it measures is the common high quality of carbon credit being issued enhancing? And the quick reply is in case you look from, we have now the index all the way in which again to 2021. Until the top of 2024, you see a major enchancment. The index has doubled. However that is the place the element, sure, Duncan, doubled from what to what? It’s an index out of 10. And it was name it a spherical two, and it’s now 4 plus out of 10, 4 out of 10, not but nice. However a doubling may be very significant and we all know the place it’s coming from. It’s coming from much less of sure very excessive quantity, decrease high quality credit being retired, and on the proportionately extra of the great things.
So what I’m going to be watching very intently over the months to come back, is that pattern persevering with? Are we going to go as much as 4, 5, six and above? As a result of I feel that’s the key metric to observe to see whether or not the carbon markets are going to revive. Higher common high quality will result in larger confidence out there, will result in some firms which can be sort of watching this house pondering, Hey, sure, I would wish it, however can I belief it? Is it on steadiness? Is it truly extra harmful than not for me? I feel rising that variety of common issuance high quality goes assist so much. Now the opposite factor that I discover tremendous fascinating is we launched the retirement index, by the way in which, is the one that’s extra of the lagging indicator that one’s going up, however way more slowly, which is admittedly proof that the market remains to be digesting a few of the previous, and I’m simply going to say the previous junk that has been issued, and it is a name for me to the market to say, cease promoting the junk. Cease shopping for the junk. The market will get higher a lot sooner. However the different one I wished to say is an index we developed along with a associate referred to as Clear Blue Markets. And that’s an integrity worth index. And so it combines the weather of worth and high quality and it mainly has three tiers. Tier one or R, AAA, AA, single A rated credit, tier two are the Bs, and tier three are C and D. And what we are able to see is that from the top of 2023, tier one credit have sort of damaged away from the pack and commerce now at a few one and a half to $2 premium over tier two and tier three, which is unbelievable information as a result of what occurred is earlier than 2023, these indices had been all over, tier one, two, and three. As a matter of reality, you can get at the moment tier one high quality beneath the value of tier two and tier three. However what this implies at the least is that there’s correlation between high quality and worth. Hopefully it additionally signifies that high quality is being acknowledged in worth discovery. So Mike, I agree there’s street forward of us. There’s progress but to be made, however I feel these are some hopeful indicators.
BRIAN KENNY: Does that issue into the the place to purchase characteristic that you simply’re contemplating launching? It appears like that’s a great kind of pathway to giving your clients recommendation on the place to search out high-quality credit.
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: Yeah, and look, that is the great thing about having a SaaS startup, proper? You’ll be able to hearken to your clients and primarily based on what they’re saying, you’ll be able to truly begin inventing new merchandise. And what we had is a lot of clients, and I dare say that maybe Harvard was a kind of.
MIKE TOFFEL: I used to be one in every of them. Completely.
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: Who stated, “Hey, it’s actually cool that you’ve this ranking system and also you guys appear to be technically and scientifically fairly on the ball.” However now we wish to discover the place we are able to purchase these extremely rated credit, these A-rated credit. And it’s not really easy. As a result of what you might have to keep in mind on this market, it’s not as if each market middleman carries the entire market stock. Everyone sort of has their 10 or their 15, or in some instances there are 50 or so initiatives, however there are literally thousands of them on the market.
What we began doing at first is we simply saved a PDF of, hey, these individuals carry a lot of these extremely rated credit, and that caught on. And so we determined to make a web page on our platform out of it, and that’s going to evolve a bit extra, nevertheless it did trigger questions on that essential subject of neutrality, independence, and transparency. And so we set it up as a listing of sellers. We don’t cost the vendor to be on there.
BRIAN KENNY: Yeah. And if their placement on that checklist ties again to the science and the information and the ranking construction, then it ought to, that in and of itself ought to give individuals confidence.
MIKE TOFFEL: Calyx had evaluated all this data from the registries, and in some instances I thought knew both by their contacts or their contacts of contacts, like how one would possibly get their fingers on buying these, or at the least had a headstart. However they had been so cautious about not desirous to be perceived as an on-ramp to builders that they had been quiet about that for a very long time and now they’re shifting in a special path the place they’re saying, “Okay, if we offer that data with out getting any revenues from it, with out charging any charges, with out favor,” then that really is mission aligned with their targets, as Duncan stated, of making an attempt to strengthen the carbon market. As a result of on the finish of the day, the way in which that occurs is by consumers leaning in to favor larger high quality initiatives. And if it seems that Calyx was impeding the power for purchasers to make that selection, then we’re like, properly, okay, there’s kind of a battle in our insurance policies right here and which manner will we wish to go? However that’s my interpretation.
BRIAN KENNY: This has been a terrific dialog as I knew it could be, and I really feel like I’m a lot smarter about carbon credit than I used to be earlier than we began speaking. We’ve acquired time for another query for every of you, and I’ll begin with you Duncan, as a result of I at all times give the case author the final phrase in these conversations. However let’s look forward a bit bit. As you have a look at how the market itself evolves, how do you see Calyx’s function within the trade and the way do you see each Calyx and the trade altering over the subsequent 5 years or so?
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: Yeah, wanting forward, I feel for us, and it gained’t shock you most likely after this dialog, that for us, credibility and independence goes to proceed to be essential. It’s going to proceed to be on the very core of what we do, and we predict it’s additionally going to be core to how this market evolves. Will it develop to a extremely sturdy and impactful piece of the puzzle for all of us in society, for companies, for governments and others in doing one thing about local weather change? Yeah. Credibility will probably be essential to that. I feel our function as an organization, we’re going to proceed down the trail of being a friction reducer. It has been too difficult for firms to search out and purchase carbon credit and particularly to search out and purchase carbon credit with good details about whether or not these credit are going to have influence or not.
And I feel in case you take a 5, ten-year look, I feel we’re headed in direction of a world the place firms may have that twin P&L and steadiness sheet, one round finance and one round influence on local weather, influence on another dimensions as properly. And I feel what we’re engaged on goes to play a job in placing a worth on that steadiness sheet on each the asset and the legal responsibility facet, however that’s for the medium time period.
BRIAN KENNY: Yeah, we’ve even seen some companies which can be of their annual stories which can be beginning to actually embrace this as an indicator of the corporate’s well being.
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: Sure. I wouldn’t be shocked if we noticed an increasing number of of that. I feel that’s a long-term pattern that however any near-term volatility is sure to solely get larger.
BRIAN KENNY: Sure, sure. So Mike, let me flip to you for the final query. I at all times ask, you realize, what’s one large thought you need our listeners to remove from the case? And right here, you realize, I really feel like we’ve talked a lot about integrity and belief and transparency. That’s actually one of many belongings you need individuals to consider. However how do you concentrate on it within the context of this and the broader house itself?
MIKE TOFFEL: Yeah, I suppose I’d say two issues right here. One is, I feel that’s a extremely fascinating house for pondering by how do you add worth and to whom? Simply do an entire stakeholder evaluation. We’ve talked actually solely about two gamers to date, the consumers and the builders. However there’s additionally traders in, for instance, in carbon credit. So that you’re including, if I had been going to take a position 1,000,000 {dollars} in a carbon-credit mission, whether or not or not it’s a brand new expertise or an current expertise in no matter nation, I wouldn’t thoughts having a bit third-party due diligence do some work primarily based on their experience to assist me determine with some predictive accuracy, how good will this mission be rated if the builders do every part they are saying they’re going to do? The place does that fall in Calyx’s sense of guaranteeing integrity of their very own fame? Is that an space that they may pursue? That’s totally different in two regards. One is it’s a special stakeholder and in addition it’s totally different timing as a result of what I described is like earlier than the mission even will get began, whereas they’re specializing in consumers after the mission’s accomplished.
One of many issues I’m actually wanting ahead to in educating this case is I feel college students are going to give you an entire host of concepts of areas that they may add worth. That’s the primary half. After which the second half is the place ought to they attempt to seize that worth? The place does the beneficial properties of that not have this destructive spillover that may cannibalize markets, for instance, of their purchaser facet? And I feel that’s going to be tremendous enjoyable. I suppose the very last thing I’ll say is I like organizations like this whose, in case you suppose long run, in the event that they’re tremendous profitable, they’ll most likely be out of enterprise. As a result of what I’d outline as, sorry, Duncan, what I’d outline as tremendous profitable is that you simply get this nearly grading like eggs, proper? Such as you go to the grocery store, it’s proper on the package deal. Is that this double A, triple A dimension? Is it grass fed? Is it natural? Eggs are a great analogy because-
BRIAN KENNY: I don’t know in the event that they’re good as a result of I get confused after I go to the grocery retailer to purchase eggs.
MIKE TOFFEL: Yeah, however extra A’s is best than fewer A’s, proper? I imply, you might have that fundamental thought. So you realize, on the one hand, eggs are a commodity, however not likely. That doesn’t imply that they’re all interchangeable. There’s a gradation system that’s proper there on the package deal that’s authorities regulated and authorities enforced. And by my mind-set, like that’s what success would appear like. And you may’t promote eggs beneath a sure high quality as a result of we simply regulate them out of existence. And possibly that’s the place that is all heading. And if that’s the case, then you realize there’s no marketplace for personal rankings of eggs as a result of the federal government does it for you. And so I wish to get college students’ perspective on that as properly.
BRIAN KENNY: Feels like there is likely to be a B case down the street. I don’t know.
MIKE TOFFEL: For certain.
BRIAN KENNY: Yeah. Mike, Duncan, thanks a lot for becoming a member of me on Chilly Name.
MIKE TOFFEL: Thanks for having us.
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: Thanks a lot.
BRIAN KENNY: In the event you take pleasure in Chilly Name, you would possibly like our different podcasts, After Hours, Local weather Rising, Deep Function, IdeaCast, Managing the Way forward for Work, Skydeck, Assume Massive, Purchase Small, and Girls at Work, discover them on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you hear. And in case you might take a minute to charge and evaluate us, we’d be grateful. When you’ve got any options or simply wish to say hiya, we wish to hear from you, e-mail us at . Thanks once more for becoming a member of us, I’m your host Brian Kenny, and also you’ve been listening to Chilly Name, an official podcast of Harvard Enterprise College and a part of the HBR Podcast Community.
You might also like
BRIAN KENNY: At present on Chilly Name, we’ll discuss one thing all of us have, however many people haven’t any clue what it’s. I’m talking of a carbon footprint. It’s a time period that helps to explain the full quantity of greenhouse gases, primarily carbon dioxide, launched into the ambiance due to human actions that contribute to local weather change. Your footprint contains emissions from belongings you do on daily basis, like driving, heating your private home, consuming, and buying. The typical carbon footprint within the US is the equal of 16 metric tons of carbon dioxide, which is about thrice the worldwide common. The excellent news is that you would be able to cut back your footprint by merely doing much less of these issues. But when that’s not an choice and also you wish to make an enormous discount quick, you’ll be able to flip to carbon credit. World carbon markets are valued at almost $1 trillion and rising quick. As organizations and nations race to adjust to carbon discount targets, it’s an advanced and chaotic panorama. At present on Chilly Name, we welcome Professor Mike Toffel and visitor Duncan van Bergen to debate the case, “Calyx World: Ranking Carbon Credit.” I’m your host Brian Kenny, and also you’re listening to Chilly Name on the HBR Podcast Community.
Mike Toffel’s analysis examines how firms are addressing local weather change and different environmental and dealing situation points. He’s additionally a fellow podcaster as creator and host of HBS’s Local weather Rising. Mike, welcome.
MIKE TOFFEL: Thanks a lot, Brian.
BRIAN KENNY: Haven’t had you on the present shortly. It’s nice to have you ever again.
MIKE TOFFEL: It’s nice to be right here.
BRIAN KENNY: And right this moment we’re actually happy to have the protagonist in our case, Duncan van Bergen, who’s a co-founder at Calyx World, who beforehand labored at Shell and McKinsey, and he’s a graduate of Harvard Enterprise College. Duncan, welcome.
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: Thanks. Thanks a lot for having me.
BRIAN KENNY: I felt like I needed to clarify carbon footprint on the outset as a result of I don’t perceive it, and I’m going to imagine lots of our listeners don’t both. I truly made an try to grasp what my carbon footprint is, and I’m embarrassed to say that it’s not 16. It’s like 23.4, which to make use of a Boston slang time period is depraved dangerous, I feel.
MIKE TOFFEL: Yeah, it’s most likely pushed by flights, is my guess.
BRIAN KENNY: So right this moment we’re going to speak about carbon credit and the carbon market, and Calyx is on the heart of that dialogue. It’s difficult, proper Duncan?
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: It may be a bit difficult, certainly. Yeah.
BRIAN KENNY: We’re going to get into a few of the particulars of what makes it difficult, however Mike, I assumed I’d begin with you. I at all times wish to ask our college what conjures up them to write down a selected case and why they suppose it could make for a great dialogue within the classroom. What was it about Calyx?
MIKE TOFFEL: Yeah, that’s a terrific query. The voluntary carbon markets is a extremely fascinating house as a result of once we take into consideration the necessity for firms and international locations to scale back their carbon footprint, we frequently will take into consideration organizations making investments in-house to, for instance, change their heating from pure fuel to electrified warmth pumps. And procuring renewable power to energy that, or different makes an attempt like that. These are actually necessary. In addition they can take motion of their merchandise to make them extra power environment friendly, however on the identical time, there’s numerous costly objects after they get by the primary few. And so what carbon credit do is that they provide the alternative to pay others who’ve cheaper strategies of lowering their carbon footprint, and you then get to assert credit score for it. There’s a particular variety of activists and different involved individuals who don’t view this as equal within the carbon house. And a part of that cause is that there’s been a lot of scandals which have proven that those that are taking the motion, whom you’re paying to scale back emissions, usually are not essentially doing the calculations appropriately, they’re exaggerating, or there’s efforts to reverse. Typically there’s a forest fireplace or there’s subsequent improvement that may take out some bushes that you simply’d planted, that they’d planted in your behalf. And so there’s been some controversy round this.
One of many fascinating arbiters of this to enter the market to attempt to assist consumers determine which of those carbon credit are extra legit than others are carbon credit standing businesses. Calyx World is on the heart of that, together with a number of different firms. And I met Duncan a number of years in the past at a HBS reunion the place he sat on a panel that I moderated about local weather change. And that was the primary I’d actually heard of this market. And the primary I’d met Duncan, and subsequently I’ve met him and his colleagues and it’s a brilliant fascinating house.
BRIAN KENNY: Yeah. Duncan, let me flip to you for a minute, and I’d love to listen to extra about Calyx, about why you had been concerned in founding it and what had been a few of the belongings you had been making an attempt to resolve by getting concerned on this house?
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: My co-founder, Donna Lee, and I mainly got here in our personal very separate methods from a spot of what I’d say is firsthand understanding of simply how difficult it may be for a purchaser of carbon credit. And lots of the consumers are firms to know which credit truly ship on the claims the credit score makes. And simply to get that out of the way in which, the core declare a carbon credit score makes is that it stands for one metric ton, of eliminated or lowered emissions. Identical to Mike defined, they purchase this credit score on the idea that, hey, it actually stands for a ton, and I can compensate for a ton of my emissions for this one credit score. And we knew firsthand, we had seen and lived firsthand, that it may be fairly difficult to know which credit truly fulfill that declare and which don’t. And we each come from a spot the place our core assumption is that consumers wish to have actual influence, that that is extra than simply window dressing, and that they need to have the ability to make the precise selection. And the flip facet of that’s clearly additionally true, is that firms don’t wish to be referred to as out for having purchased junk credit and claims of greenwashing, observe that, et cetera, et cetera. However once more, it may be a bit bit difficult to separate the wheat from the chaff on this market. And that’s the place we are available in with Calyx World. We wish to make it straightforward for firms to choose for extra actual influence with carbon credit.
BRIAN KENNY: Yeah. Mike, possibly you can provide our listeners a greater understanding of, we’ve acquired the voluntary credit after which we’ve acquired the obligatory credit. How are these totally different and the place does Calyx match kind of within the panorama of the voluntary credit score house?
MIKE TOFFEL: Yeah, so the origin of carbon buying and selling actually comes from the regulatory house and the UN treaties that allowed international locations to satisfy a few of their targets by shopping for credit from different international locations, whether or not that’s inside the EU for instance, or globally throughout much less developed international locations, investing in initiatives, promoting to extra developed international locations. In order that was the origin. However then the diffusion and the unfold of nations signing up for targets to which they might be held legally accountable in a considerably weak worldwide framework, actually didn’t take off past the EU and some different international locations. In response, lots of international locations and even cities and organizations like Harvard have stated, “We predict this nonetheless must occur.” And they also’ve kind of crammed within the breach with this voluntary carbon market. And so, you see web zero targets or science-based targets, an entire litany of voluntary commitments, different commitments simply say, we wish to cut back our carbon footprint by X % by a given date. Harvard College has stated that we wish to cut back our fossil gasoline emissions to zero ultimately. And within the quick time period, we wish to cut back our fossil gasoline emissions. We wish to neutralize them having web zero fossil gasoline by 2026. Meaning not solely lowering our carbon but in addition lowering the well being impacts of fossil fuels.
And so for that, we’re making an attempt to determine what are the precise actions internally and externally to determine the package deal of actions to pursue. So, for instance, and that is an space the place I’m working with our college colleagues to attempt to assist determine this out. We not too long ago introduced that we’re investing in some new renewable capability throughout the US to attempt to offset, we don’t name it offset there, however we are saying neutralize, the facility, the fossil fuels related to the facility manufacturing, the electrical energy that we buy.` However then we have now fossil fuels that we combust on campus for heating and for the buses and vehicles that we function. And we’re making an attempt to determine how a lot of that and the way quickly will we decarbonize these shift to electrical typically, versus serious about `what sort of carbon credit ought to we procure? And for that course of having, we even have a contract with Calyx, we’re a subscriber to their service in order that we are able to see their tackle varied carbon credit, and we have now entry to their consultants. We’ve had many conversations with Donna, Duncan’s colleague, about how to consider the market. So I’m not solely writing a case about them, however I’m additionally getting a perspective from, yeah, the consumer perspective and from a staff that’s making an attempt to determine how will we meet these targets.
BRIAN KENNY: Yeah, that’s a terrific transition to a query I’ve for you, Duncan, which is, as you’re serious about the ranking system, are you able to inform us what makes for a high-quality credit score? What are the kind of greatest pink flags that you simply see the place it involves low-quality credit?
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: For starters, let me maybe emphasize that we have a look at three totally different dimensions of high quality once we say we charge credit. The one that everyone thinks about is what we name greenhouse fuel integrity. Does this credit score actually characterize one ton? And that’s positively one space that we focus so much on, however there’s two others. One is what we name SDG influence. And SDG influence seems at when credit make claims of getting influence on a number of of the UN sustainable improvement targets, is there substance behind that declare? And infrequently individuals suppose, Hey, that’s just a bit layer of promoting on prime of the credit score, however we imagine that it’s doable to investigate that as properly. And third, we have a look at one thing referred to as environmental and social danger when it comes to, does this credit score in any manner current a danger of hurt to the neighborhood during which the mission is operated or the surroundings the place it takes place?
However let me return to that first one, which lots of people ask about is okay, properly, how will we assess greenhouse fuel integrity? It’s actually a three-step course of. First, we assess the carbon crediting program, so the set of the infrastructure, if you’ll, that’s used to create credit. There are a variety of requirements which were used for a decade or two like this all over the world, and we charge these requirements, if you want, when it comes to as a setup, as a construction, as an infrastructure. Do they really work with sufficient transparency, with sufficient scientific content material, et cetera to essentially be capable to assure the supply of fine credit?
The second step is we conduct a really in-depth evaluate of the methodology used to create the carbon credit. In order you’ll be able to think about, credit from capturing methane coming off landfills are very totally different in nature than what Mike was speaking about earlier than, planting bushes or a few of the extra superior expertise approaches like issues like enhanced rock weathering or biochar manufacturing or issues like that. They’re all very totally different and every has their very own methodology. So we evaluate these methodologies.
The third and remaining step is reviewing the precise particular person initiatives that create carbon credit. In order that particular person mission the place methane escaping from a landfill, you’ll be able to nearly think about it, is being captured and both flared into much less heavy greenhouse gases or is captured to supply electrical energy from. And so we have a look at that mission and we have a look at an entire collection of dangers. And these dangers are pretty generally accepted within the house. They embrace additionality: would this mission have occurred with out carbon finance? As a result of the precept is that if a mission would have occurred anyway, you then shouldn’t get credit for it. Issues like permanence. Mike was referring to it earlier, what sort of mitigations are in place to ensure that if reversals occur, that these are correctly accounted for? Issues like linkage: are the emission financial savings or removals not simply being displaced to a different space when say we shield a chunk of forest, how will we ensure that defending this piece of forest doesn’t result in extra deforestation 100 miles to the east or west? There’s a lot of dangers like that, and people are actually a few of the extra well-known ones that we assess as a part of this course of.
BRIAN KENNY: Yeah, and also you’re not the one ones doing this, proper? The case talks about another individuals within the house or organizations which can be within the house. I’m questioning how alike or totally different are your rankings from theirs, and the way does this kind of form the influence of the market?
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: Yeah, you’re proper. There are a few different raters within the house, and I feel it’s a great factor that there’s selection on this house. And I feel it’s an necessary level as a result of generally I’m going to conferences and other people attempt to problem me and say, properly, cling on. Not everyone even agrees on what high quality means in carbon credit. And I’d say, “I feel that’s incorrect. I feel everyone’s just about aligned.” And I’d level to the core carbon ideas of the ICVCM, the Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market. As 10 actually good ideas that define what a carbon credit score should adjust to or the usual that ought to be met. And I can say, I feel all of the rankings businesses approaches are plugged into these core carbon ideas. I’d say past that, sure, there are some variations. A number of the dangers that every of us assesses are we assess them a bit totally different, and that may result in totally different rankings for the same mission. And it additionally signifies that say a double B in a single ranking system doesn’t imply precisely the identical as a double B in one other system. It’s a younger trade. I anticipate that regularly there will probably be convergence as all of us turn into an increasing number of clear about how we do it, and we get to benchmark our approaches. I’m certain there’s going to be some studying moving into all instructions.
BRIAN KENNY: And we all know expertise has a huge impact, and the appearance of AI is impacting just about every part. I’m questioning what you see as the way forward for expertise in credit score and carbon rankings.
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: I’m going to instantly lose each shred of credibility that I’ve constructed up within the final couple of minutes. I’m going to launch 4 or 5 buzzwords in a single go after which defend that all of them apply. And after I say digitization it’s sort of an apparent one, however then I’m going to say distant sensing and geospatial, then I’m going to say blockchain, then I’m going to say AI is the cherry on prime. However I feel all of them are related. And I’d begin with digitization. I’d say this ecosystem remains to be in a strategy of digitization. Many elements of this chain which can be being performed with PDFs and a few pretty fundamental methodologies. There’s a very generally used course of for measuring the girth of bushes. It’s referred to as measurement at chest peak. And lots of the documentation is being handed from one participant within the ecosystem to a different by utilizing PDF paperwork which can be uploaded and downloaded onto registries. That’s clearly not the way in which it’s going to be. That is going to turn into extra digital. Each participant goes to have the digital document on the market, and we hope and sit up for having the ability to plug right into a extra digital model of this ecosystem. Distant sensing and geospatial is way talked about within the house, and the advances have been great over the past couple of many years. And the provision, the ubiquity of geospatial knowledge, has additionally simply exploded. We use it extensively. We make the case that you would be able to’t dispose of all points of high quality evaluation simply by saying, “Hey, I’ve acquired satellite tv for pc knowledge.” However we predict it’s a really great tool, and each builders and ourselves make intensive use of it.
And you then get to issues like blockchain and AI. I’ll simply point out it as a result of if you concentrate on what blockchain is sweet at, it’s about ensuring there’s a clear chain of custody alongside an entire collection of gamers, and also you want to have the ability to ensure that no matter adjustments are performed, that there’s a clear document of it. Now, I feel that’s sort of nearly the textbook case for that sort of distributed expertise, and I haven’t but seen anyone actually crack how it could play a job right here, however I’ve to anticipate that that’s going to be the case. After which lastly, AI, I feel goes to play an enormous function when it comes to serving to speed up issues like knowledge ingestion and interpretation. And we’re closely experimenting with how we are able to deploy that well, each in our personal sort of back-office course of in addition to for serving to our clients. However I’ll say one factor on that after which I’ll cease my buzzword enjoyable honest.
BRIAN KENNY: I’ve loved it. I’ve loved the buzzword-
MIKE TOFFEL: Buzzword Bingo.
BRIAN KENNY: Yeah.
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: I ponder the place I discovered that, however I used to be listening to a different podcast—not fairly pretty much as good as this one—
BRIAN KENNY: Thanks.
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: —of The Economist the opposite day, and it was concerning the significance of knowledge in the entire AI revolution. They had been saying there’s three issues, proper? There’s compute energy that’s elevated tremendously. Algorithms and knowledge. And what we discover ourselves sitting on at Calyx World is among the greatest troves of deep insights into what makes sure methodologies work and never work, what makes sure mission sorts work and never work. And so we’re actually targeted on ensuring we proceed to curate that greatest and largest set of data round how carbon credit work, how carbon crediting initiatives work, how high quality works, how these totally different requirements and methodologies work. And we predict that’s a key piece of how this expertise panorama will form up.
BRIAN KENNY: Yeah, that every one makes nice sense. Mike, I wish to come again to one thing you had been alluding to earlier, and that is extra concerning the central theme that runs by the case, actually addresses the challenges to integrity. And possibly you’ll be able to for our listeners lay out a bit bit what a few of the greatest dangers are to integrity for companies like Calyx as they attempt to set up themselves on this place.
MIKE TOFFEL: Properly, I feel one of many greatest dangers to Calyx or any ranking company is their must be considered to be and to be considered as honest arbiters of the analyses that they’re conducting. And that is true for inspectors, that’s a few of the work I do is inspectors who’re going to look into international provide chain factories to let the manufacturers know the way the manufacturing unit is doing. They share an identical want for integrity. They must be considered as straight shooters who’re going to inform the reality regardless of who pays them. And there’s some proof in that house that who pays them truly influences their stories, which is problematic. In monetary rankings of bonds, for instance, it’s normally the bond issuer who pays the monetary rater, this Moody’s or S&P or Pitch to do their ranking. It’s not nice from an optics perspective {that a} municipality or an organization is paying somebody to evaluate the integrity and chapter danger of their very own entity. However that’s the way in which the world works in monetary rankings.
Take into consideration auditing, proper? Monetary auditing, identical factor. Ostensibly the board hires the auditors, however normally with the assent of the company managers to audit the agency, you’re like, that doesn’t appear nice, proper? They’re purported to be working for the shareholder. So anyway, there’s all this background of kind of potential conflicts of curiosity and enter the carbon credit standing house, a reasonably new house, as Duncan talked about, they’re including worth to many gamers. They’re including worth to consumers, whether or not it’s Harvard or Microsoft or whomever who wish to know which of those carbon credit have extra integrity than others. They’re additionally including worth actually to builders of high-quality rankings. As a result of ultimately, as these rankings get integrated in pricing, builders who supply high-quality initiatives are going to get larger costs for his or her credit. And those who have decrease high quality initiatives will get decrease costs. Like that’s the way in which it’s purported to work.
So you’ll be able to think about, properly, one of many questions is in case you’re including worth to a wide range of gamers, who must you attempt to promote to? Like who must you truly acquire revenues from? And what’s fascinating on this house is simply since you’re creating worth for a bunch of gamers doesn’t imply it’s the precise factor to do to attempt to seize that worth from these gamers. And what Duncan and Donna and Calyx have performed to date, as I perceive, is that they’re actually very a lot targeted on this and targeted on incomes revenues from consumers. That’s their fundamental play. They’ve a subscription mannequin they are saying though we add worth for builders too, we’re going to deal with the customer facet. Now, a few of the rivals are making totally different selections as a result of you’ll be able to think about when do you charge? On this case, they’re ranking after the carbon credit are issued, or at the least technically maybe as soon as the mission is registered and prepared and out there to promote credit.
And so if Harvard College needs to determine to purchase credit, we are able to look on Calyx’s web site by our subscription and see which initiatives are extremely rated, which of them are poorly rated. As far as I perceive, they’re not promoting to builders. Others on this house are promoting to builders. And once more, you’ll be able to see why, as a result of builders of top of the range need to have the ability to promote that. However you then’re like, hmm, there is likely to be a notion at the least of a battle of curiosity. And so I feel that’s a brilliant fascinating query that we’ll debate within the classroom. That is what drew me in. I’m within the context, however I feel what’s going to be so fascinating within the classroom moreover speaking concerning the attributes of carbon credit that make them extra reliable or extra genuine and credible, is that this query of enterprise technique and who do you promote to? What are the results? What’s the upside? What’s the potential draw back?
BRIAN KENNY: Yeah. Duncan, does this all ring true to you? I’m questioning how do you concentrate on navigating the battle of curiosity challenge? Have been there different fashions that you simply checked out? I imply, you’re nonetheless a younger agency. What had been a few of the issues that you simply possibly thought, properly, we don’t wish to do it that manner, we wish to do it this fashion?
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: Yeah, it completely resonates and might be has been and continues to be a core subject of dialogue between Donna and myself and others within the staff. How will we be sure we fulfill our mission? Our mission as an organization is to attempt to make carbon markets stronger, make them higher, and have extra influence each for the planet and for individuals. Donna and I each have been on this house for fairly some time. I’ve been in carbon markets for approaching a decade. Donna has been in local weather and carbon for over 20 years, however we began the corporate in 2021 when carbon markets in comparison with right this moment had been completely booming. Demand was rising hand over fist, and Donna and I had been each ready the place we had seen firsthand that there was truly a really large variability in high quality out there. There have been junk credit and there have been actually high-quality credit.
And we had been additionally conscious of a few of the questions being raised by media and civil society round integrity and round a few of these credit and the problems with them. I wouldn’t fairly go as far as that saying that we predicted this disaster of confidence that’s been out there for the final couple of years. However we positively had been conscious of the issues. And once we regarded on the core points behind these issues, we noticed an absence of transparency and misaligned incentives as key to why these issues existed. And Donna truly wrote an fascinating weblog on this subject not way back. It’s referred to as, “Carbon Credit as Credence Items, Why That Issues.” And certainly, they’re credence items. You’ve got this actually large imbalance between what a developer is aware of about carbon credit and what the customer is aware of. And meaning you must be extra cautious. And these incentives, it’s honest to say that a lot of events within the ecosystem, together with the requirements our bodies, together with the verification and validation our bodies, the auditors which can be paid on this house are paid for quantity. They’re paid for the variety of carbon credit issued, and that makes the builders their clients. And I’ll be the final one to say that any occasion in that alternate is making an attempt to do the incorrect factor, nevertheless it makes the developer your buyer, it makes quantity, your goal operate. Yeah. Extra quantity, extra money for everyone. And we made a elementary selection that we thought the function we wished to play as that unbiased arbiter, that unbiased advisor, that we might greatest play that if we prevented that battle altogether by not promoting rankings to builders. So right this moment, you can’t, as a developer, pay us to conduct a ranking for you both earlier than the credit score’s being issued or after the credit score’s being issued. We oriented our enterprise mannequin solely to the purchase facet.
So yeah, it’s been a query that we’ve revisited a lot of instances, however each time we have now believed that orienting ourselves to the purchase facet is certainly the viable mannequin. And we imagine nonetheless wanting on the market right this moment, that unbiased view on high quality continues to be a worth. And that as a matter of reality, past the standard query, there are many different frictions on this market the place we predict we are able to present, as an unbiased occasion a terrific service nearly as an unbiased trusted gateway to the market.
BRIAN KENNY: This actually looks like a key theme all through the case. The truth is, the case references the Guardian article as kind of an indicator of the way in which the media has reacted to this. There’s lots of skepticism, maybe understandably, as a result of individuals don’t actually get it, they don’t actually perceive it deeply sufficient to know whether or not or not it’s legitimate know. How has Calyx, the function that they’ve performed right here making an attempt to coach the market, how has that labored?
MIKE TOFFEL: I’d say the skepticism doesn’t a lot come from a lack of information. I feel it comes from the truth that the trade is weak to shaky-quality credit. And there’s a lot of efforts underway to attempt to sort of shake out of the market such credit, carbon ranking businesses like Calyx is a kind of performs. There’s others, Duncan had talked about the ICVCM, the Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market. That’s a comparatively latest nonprofit that’s come out to attempt to make public its selections about what mandatory parts are for the standard of credit and the applications which can be additionally referred to as requirements or registries. These are firms just like the Gold Normal and Verra and so forth, who had been the only real arbiters actually, of what qualifies for being referred to as a credit score and whose methodologies had been attacked, for instance, by that Guardian article. And by subsequent articles as properly, they’re additionally going through this strain and tightening their belts and updating their methodologies and updating their oversight over the third events they rent on the mission degree referred to as verifiers and validators, third-party organizations which can be concerned with guaranteeing the initiatives meet these applications. So there’s lots of gamers right here. In order that they’re each making an attempt to extend the stringency of their requirements and their oversight of those verifiers. So there’s lots of motion proper now afoot.
What can be fascinating to see as you have a look at snapshots over time from Calyx’s rankings and from its rivals’ rankings, is the distribution rising proper? Are we seeing fewer low-quality credit in the marketplace and extra high-quality in the marketplace? That might be kind of good proof that really this market’s shifting. I’d be keen on Duncan’s perspective, however from my view of some latest stories by Calyx and by BeZero and others on this house, they’re nonetheless exhibiting only a few high-quality and many low-quality carbon credit in the marketplace. So there’s numerous work to be performed for my part. Though I do suppose we’re shifting in the precise path. I don’t suppose we’re a 12 months or two away from this being resolved. However Duncan, can I chilly name you to ask you your take?
BRIAN KENNY: Yeah, you stated you want chilly calls.
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: I’m undecided you had been supposed to inform everyone that, however look, it’s the precise query, Mike. Is the market enhancing? We not too long ago launched a collection of indices, we name it the Calyx Carbon Integrity Index. And we have now two one on the issuance facet, which is a little bit of a number one indicator, and the opposite one on the retirement facet, which is a lagging indicator. And actually what it measures is the common high quality of carbon credit being issued enhancing? And the quick reply is in case you look from, we have now the index all the way in which again to 2021. Until the top of 2024, you see a major enchancment. The index has doubled. However that is the place the element, sure, Duncan, doubled from what to what? It’s an index out of 10. And it was name it a spherical two, and it’s now 4 plus out of 10, 4 out of 10, not but nice. However a doubling may be very significant and we all know the place it’s coming from. It’s coming from much less of sure very excessive quantity, decrease high quality credit being retired, and on the proportionately extra of the great things.
So what I’m going to be watching very intently over the months to come back, is that pattern persevering with? Are we going to go as much as 4, 5, six and above? As a result of I feel that’s the key metric to observe to see whether or not the carbon markets are going to revive. Higher common high quality will result in larger confidence out there, will result in some firms which can be sort of watching this house pondering, Hey, sure, I would wish it, however can I belief it? Is it on steadiness? Is it truly extra harmful than not for me? I feel rising that variety of common issuance high quality goes assist so much. Now the opposite factor that I discover tremendous fascinating is we launched the retirement index, by the way in which, is the one that’s extra of the lagging indicator that one’s going up, however way more slowly, which is admittedly proof that the market remains to be digesting a few of the previous, and I’m simply going to say the previous junk that has been issued, and it is a name for me to the market to say, cease promoting the junk. Cease shopping for the junk. The market will get higher a lot sooner. However the different one I wished to say is an index we developed along with a associate referred to as Clear Blue Markets. And that’s an integrity worth index. And so it combines the weather of worth and high quality and it mainly has three tiers. Tier one or R, AAA, AA, single A rated credit, tier two are the Bs, and tier three are C and D. And what we are able to see is that from the top of 2023, tier one credit have sort of damaged away from the pack and commerce now at a few one and a half to $2 premium over tier two and tier three, which is unbelievable information as a result of what occurred is earlier than 2023, these indices had been all over, tier one, two, and three. As a matter of reality, you can get at the moment tier one high quality beneath the value of tier two and tier three. However what this implies at the least is that there’s correlation between high quality and worth. Hopefully it additionally signifies that high quality is being acknowledged in worth discovery. So Mike, I agree there’s street forward of us. There’s progress but to be made, however I feel these are some hopeful indicators.
BRIAN KENNY: Does that issue into the the place to purchase characteristic that you simply’re contemplating launching? It appears like that’s a great kind of pathway to giving your clients recommendation on the place to search out high-quality credit.
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: Yeah, and look, that is the great thing about having a SaaS startup, proper? You’ll be able to hearken to your clients and primarily based on what they’re saying, you’ll be able to truly begin inventing new merchandise. And what we had is a lot of clients, and I dare say that maybe Harvard was a kind of.
MIKE TOFFEL: I used to be one in every of them. Completely.
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: Who stated, “Hey, it’s actually cool that you’ve this ranking system and also you guys appear to be technically and scientifically fairly on the ball.” However now we wish to discover the place we are able to purchase these extremely rated credit, these A-rated credit. And it’s not really easy. As a result of what you might have to keep in mind on this market, it’s not as if each market middleman carries the entire market stock. Everyone sort of has their 10 or their 15, or in some instances there are 50 or so initiatives, however there are literally thousands of them on the market.
What we began doing at first is we simply saved a PDF of, hey, these individuals carry a lot of these extremely rated credit, and that caught on. And so we determined to make a web page on our platform out of it, and that’s going to evolve a bit extra, nevertheless it did trigger questions on that essential subject of neutrality, independence, and transparency. And so we set it up as a listing of sellers. We don’t cost the vendor to be on there.
BRIAN KENNY: Yeah. And if their placement on that checklist ties again to the science and the information and the ranking construction, then it ought to, that in and of itself ought to give individuals confidence.
MIKE TOFFEL: Calyx had evaluated all this data from the registries, and in some instances I thought knew both by their contacts or their contacts of contacts, like how one would possibly get their fingers on buying these, or at the least had a headstart. However they had been so cautious about not desirous to be perceived as an on-ramp to builders that they had been quiet about that for a very long time and now they’re shifting in a special path the place they’re saying, “Okay, if we offer that data with out getting any revenues from it, with out charging any charges, with out favor,” then that really is mission aligned with their targets, as Duncan stated, of making an attempt to strengthen the carbon market. As a result of on the finish of the day, the way in which that occurs is by consumers leaning in to favor larger high quality initiatives. And if it seems that Calyx was impeding the power for purchasers to make that selection, then we’re like, properly, okay, there’s kind of a battle in our insurance policies right here and which manner will we wish to go? However that’s my interpretation.
BRIAN KENNY: This has been a terrific dialog as I knew it could be, and I really feel like I’m a lot smarter about carbon credit than I used to be earlier than we began speaking. We’ve acquired time for another query for every of you, and I’ll begin with you Duncan, as a result of I at all times give the case author the final phrase in these conversations. However let’s look forward a bit bit. As you have a look at how the market itself evolves, how do you see Calyx’s function within the trade and the way do you see each Calyx and the trade altering over the subsequent 5 years or so?
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: Yeah, wanting forward, I feel for us, and it gained’t shock you most likely after this dialog, that for us, credibility and independence goes to proceed to be essential. It’s going to proceed to be on the very core of what we do, and we predict it’s additionally going to be core to how this market evolves. Will it develop to a extremely sturdy and impactful piece of the puzzle for all of us in society, for companies, for governments and others in doing one thing about local weather change? Yeah. Credibility will probably be essential to that. I feel our function as an organization, we’re going to proceed down the trail of being a friction reducer. It has been too difficult for firms to search out and purchase carbon credit and particularly to search out and purchase carbon credit with good details about whether or not these credit are going to have influence or not.
And I feel in case you take a 5, ten-year look, I feel we’re headed in direction of a world the place firms may have that twin P&L and steadiness sheet, one round finance and one round influence on local weather, influence on another dimensions as properly. And I feel what we’re engaged on goes to play a job in placing a worth on that steadiness sheet on each the asset and the legal responsibility facet, however that’s for the medium time period.
BRIAN KENNY: Yeah, we’ve even seen some companies which can be of their annual stories which can be beginning to actually embrace this as an indicator of the corporate’s well being.
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: Sure. I wouldn’t be shocked if we noticed an increasing number of of that. I feel that’s a long-term pattern that however any near-term volatility is sure to solely get larger.
BRIAN KENNY: Sure, sure. So Mike, let me flip to you for the final query. I at all times ask, you realize, what’s one large thought you need our listeners to remove from the case? And right here, you realize, I really feel like we’ve talked a lot about integrity and belief and transparency. That’s actually one of many belongings you need individuals to consider. However how do you concentrate on it within the context of this and the broader house itself?
MIKE TOFFEL: Yeah, I suppose I’d say two issues right here. One is, I feel that’s a extremely fascinating house for pondering by how do you add worth and to whom? Simply do an entire stakeholder evaluation. We’ve talked actually solely about two gamers to date, the consumers and the builders. However there’s additionally traders in, for instance, in carbon credit. So that you’re including, if I had been going to take a position 1,000,000 {dollars} in a carbon-credit mission, whether or not or not it’s a brand new expertise or an current expertise in no matter nation, I wouldn’t thoughts having a bit third-party due diligence do some work primarily based on their experience to assist me determine with some predictive accuracy, how good will this mission be rated if the builders do every part they are saying they’re going to do? The place does that fall in Calyx’s sense of guaranteeing integrity of their very own fame? Is that an space that they may pursue? That’s totally different in two regards. One is it’s a special stakeholder and in addition it’s totally different timing as a result of what I described is like earlier than the mission even will get began, whereas they’re specializing in consumers after the mission’s accomplished.
One of many issues I’m actually wanting ahead to in educating this case is I feel college students are going to give you an entire host of concepts of areas that they may add worth. That’s the primary half. After which the second half is the place ought to they attempt to seize that worth? The place does the beneficial properties of that not have this destructive spillover that may cannibalize markets, for instance, of their purchaser facet? And I feel that’s going to be tremendous enjoyable. I suppose the very last thing I’ll say is I like organizations like this whose, in case you suppose long run, in the event that they’re tremendous profitable, they’ll most likely be out of enterprise. As a result of what I’d outline as, sorry, Duncan, what I’d outline as tremendous profitable is that you simply get this nearly grading like eggs, proper? Such as you go to the grocery store, it’s proper on the package deal. Is that this double A, triple A dimension? Is it grass fed? Is it natural? Eggs are a great analogy because-
BRIAN KENNY: I don’t know in the event that they’re good as a result of I get confused after I go to the grocery retailer to purchase eggs.
MIKE TOFFEL: Yeah, however extra A’s is best than fewer A’s, proper? I imply, you might have that fundamental thought. So you realize, on the one hand, eggs are a commodity, however not likely. That doesn’t imply that they’re all interchangeable. There’s a gradation system that’s proper there on the package deal that’s authorities regulated and authorities enforced. And by my mind-set, like that’s what success would appear like. And you may’t promote eggs beneath a sure high quality as a result of we simply regulate them out of existence. And possibly that’s the place that is all heading. And if that’s the case, then you realize there’s no marketplace for personal rankings of eggs as a result of the federal government does it for you. And so I wish to get college students’ perspective on that as properly.
BRIAN KENNY: Feels like there is likely to be a B case down the street. I don’t know.
MIKE TOFFEL: For certain.
BRIAN KENNY: Yeah. Mike, Duncan, thanks a lot for becoming a member of me on Chilly Name.
MIKE TOFFEL: Thanks for having us.
DUNCAN VAN BERGEN: Thanks a lot.
BRIAN KENNY: In the event you take pleasure in Chilly Name, you would possibly like our different podcasts, After Hours, Local weather Rising, Deep Function, IdeaCast, Managing the Way forward for Work, Skydeck, Assume Massive, Purchase Small, and Girls at Work, discover them on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you hear. And in case you might take a minute to charge and evaluate us, we’d be grateful. When you’ve got any options or simply wish to say hiya, we wish to hear from you, e-mail us at . Thanks once more for becoming a member of us, I’m your host Brian Kenny, and also you’ve been listening to Chilly Name, an official podcast of Harvard Enterprise College and a part of the HBR Podcast Community.
![4 Main Dataset Options For Your Enterprise [2025]](https://www.theautonewspaper.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/image-1-75x75.jpeg)
