I’m delighted to share the newly-published ultimate model of my article:
Synthetic Intelligence and Privateness
77 Florida Legislation Overview 1 (2025)
The article goals to offer the conceptual and sensible floor work for the right way to perceive the connection between AI and privateness in addition to present a roadmap for a way privateness regulation ought to regulate AI.
Summary:
This Article goals to ascertain a foundational understanding of the intersection between synthetic intelligence (AI) and privateness, outlining the present issues AI poses to privateness and suggesting potential instructions for the regulation’s evolution on this space. Up to now, few commentators have explored the general panorama of how AI and privateness interrelate. This Article seeks to map that territory.
Some commentators query whether or not privateness regulation is acceptable for addressing AI. On this Article, I contend that though present privateness regulation falls far in need of resolving the privateness issues with AI, privateness regulation correctly conceptualized and constituted would go a good distance towards addressing them.
Privateness issues emerge with AI’s inputs and outputs. These privateness issues are sometimes not new; they’re variations of longstanding privateness issues. However AI remixes present privateness issues in advanced and distinctive methods. Some issues are blended collectively in ways in which problem present regulatory frameworks. In lots of situations, AI exacerbates present issues, typically threatening to take them to unprecedented ranges.
General, AI just isn’t an surprising upheaval for privateness; it’s, in some ways, the longer term that has lengthy been predicted. However AI manifestly exposes the longstanding shortcomings, infirmities, and unsuitable approaches of present privateness legal guidelines.
In the end, whether or not by patches to previous legal guidelines or as a part of new legal guidelines, many points should be addressed to confront the privateness issues that AI is affecting. On this Article, I present a roadmap to the important thing points that the regulation should sort out and steerage concerning the approaches that may work and people that can fail.
* * *
This submit was authored by Professor Daniel J. Solove, who by TeachPrivacy develops computer-based privateness and information safety coaching.
NEWSLETTER: Subscribe to Professor Solove’s free publication
Order Prof. Solove’s ebook,
ON PRIVACY AND TECHNOLOGY
Subscribe to Solove’s Free E-newsletter
Prof. Solove’s Privateness Coaching
